On Thu, Nov 19, 2015, at 02:53 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Erm, I don't want this in the kernel. That's why I've proposed the lklfuse approach. I already said this before but just to repeat, since I'm confused: How would "lklfuse" be different from http://libguestfs.org/ which we at Red Hat (and a number of other organizations) use quite widely now for build systems, debugging etc. In the end it's just running the kernel in KVM with a custom protocol, with support for non-filesystem things like "install a bootloader", and it already supports FUSE. I'm pretty firmly with Al here - the attack surface increase here is too great, and we'd likely turn this off if it even did make it into the kernel. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
