----- Original Message ----- > This is just a resend of the patchset from earlier today. There was > a error in the middle of sending the set, so it looks like 10 - 32 got > dropped. > > There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support > for in the near term: > > compare and write > http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg07826.html > > copy offload/extended copy/xcopy > https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-July/msg00070.html > > The problem is if we contine to add more commands we will have to one day > extend the cmd_flags/bi_rw fields again. To prevent that, this patchset > separates the operation (REQ_WRITE, REQ_DISCARD, REQ_WRITE_SAME, etc) from > the flags (REQ_SYNC, REQ_QUIET, etc) in the bio and request structs. In the > end of this set, we will have two fields bio->bi_op/request->op and > bio->bi_rw/request->cmd_flags. > > The patches were made against Jens's linux-block tree's for-linus branch: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-linus > (last commit a22c4d7e34402ccdf3414f64c50365436eba7b93). > > I have done some basic testing for a lot of the drivers and filesystems, > but I wanted to get comments before trying to track down more hardware/ > systems for testing. > > > Known issues: > - REQ_FLUSH is still a flag, but should probably be a operation. > For lower level drivers like SCSI where we only get a flush, it makes > more sense to be a operation. However, upper layers like filesystems > can send down flushes with writes, so it is more of a flag for them. > I am still working on this. > > - There is a regression with the dm flakey target. It currently > cannot corrupt the operation values. > > - The patchset is a little awkward. It touches so much code, > but I wanted to maintain git bisectibility, so there is lots of compat code > left around until the last patches where everyting is cleaned up. Hi Mike, The GFS2 patches in patches 11, 14, 16 and 23 all look correct. You can add my: Reviewed-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> to those, but I have not reviewed the non-GFS2 bits. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat File Systems -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
