On 02/11/2015 14:56, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > But then the real question remains: > > What is the 'correct' behaviour for ioctls when no path retry > is active (or when no paths are present)? > > Should we start path activation? > If so, should we wait for path activation to finish, risking udev > killing the worker for that event (udev has a built-in timeout of > 120 seconds, which we might easily exceed when we need to activate > paths for large installations or slow path activation ... just > thinking of NetApp takeover/giveback cycle)? > If we're not waiting for path activation, where would be the point > in starting it, seeing that we're not actually interested in the result? > And if we shouldn't start a path activation, what is the point of > having code for it in the first place? That's a fair question, and it depends on what said udev worker actually does. In any case, if we don't start path activation we should return ENOTCONN, not ENOTTY. Paolo -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
