On 10/08/2015 09:44 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Sun labeled devices, the kpartx partition numbers weren't agreeing
> with the underlying device partition numbers. This is because kpartx
> doesn't count slices with no sectors, when determining the numbering.
> This patch counts these empty slices, so the numbering comes out the
> same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kpartx/sun.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kpartx/sun.c b/kpartx/sun.c
> index 3d88b21..b8c023b 100644
> --- a/kpartx/sun.c
> +++ b/kpartx/sun.c
> @@ -82,8 +82,6 @@ read_sun_pt(int fd, struct slice all, struct slice *sp, int ns) {
> for(i=0, n=0; i<SUN_DISK_MAXPARTITIONS; i++) {
> s = &l->partitions[i];
>
> - if (s->num_sectors == 0)
> - continue;
> if (n < ns) {
> sp[n].start = offset +
> be32_to_cpu(s->start_cylinder) * be16_to_cpu(l->nsect) * be16_to_cpu(l->ntrks);
>
A-ha. If you say so.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
