Re: dm-statistics: report precise timestamps and histogram

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:53:41AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 18 2015 at  4:26pm -0400,
> > > > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Mike, please submit this patch to the upstream kernel before 4.2 is 
> > > > > released, so that the all the kernels that support the options 
> > > > > "precise_timestamps" and "histogram" also report these values back.
> > > > 
> > > > Userspace will have to check the DM ioctl version to know if DM provides
> > > > these extra keywords.
> > > > 
> > > > Mike
> > > 
> > > But if you don't send it, userspace will forever have to deal with kernels 
> > > that don't report this feature back.
> > 
> > We'd either end up saying some kernels can't support it when they can, or
> > have to carry some additional userspace clutter forever to provide a 
> > workaround.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bryn.
> 
> I think you don't need to provide a workaround for kernels that don't 
> report it. The workaround would be needed just for 4.2.0 (Mike said he 
> will backport the fix to 4.2.1), there is no need to bloat userspace with 
> that.

That's what's been done; the aux data stuff has been stripped out & I've
set the ioctl version check at 4.33.0.

Bryn.
 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux