>>>>> "Heinz" == Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Heinz, Heinz> so can we rely on discard_zeroes_data if reported 100% now? The intent is for the reporting to be accurate, yes. This means that for SCSI we only turn it on when using the WRITE SAME(10/16) commands. These require the storage to physically zero out any portions of the request that can not be successfully deallocated. For SATA we can't trust the protocol but vendors are sometimes willing to provide guarantees above and beyond what is in the spec. I explicitly whitelist devices from vendors that have done so. It appears Microsoft is as disenchanted with the standards bodies as we are and are now requiring vendors to provide hard guarantees. As a result we should be able to leverage Windows qualifications going forward. That said, all storage is buggy so there is always some risk involved. But as of 3.19, discard_zeroes_data=1 has much stricter requirements than it did in prior kernels. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
