On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Coly Li wrote: > >> 2, There should be a maximum latency histogram boundaries limitation. > >> Maybe you do it in the patch and I missed it, that's should be my fault. > > There is no maximum - and there doesn't need to be any maximum because the > > array is allocated dynamically. > Maybe I am too paranoid, IMHO dynamically allocated object should have a > maximum limitation, in case of it occupies too much system resource (e.g > memory here). There is already that limitation of 1/4 total physical memory. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
