On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:08:20PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> How about below incremental patch? > >> - >> - /* >> - * If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this >> - * offset would create a gap, disallow it. >> - */ >> - if (q->queue_flags & (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SG_GAPS) && >> - bvec_gap_to_prev(prev, offset)) >> - return 0; > > You need to keep the explicit checks for the BLOCK_PC case, as we can't > split those. I'll keep it. Thanks. > > Otherwise it looks fine. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
