From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch is a prerequisite for dm-raid "raid0" support to allow
dm-raid to access the MD RAID0 personality doing unconditional
accesses to mddev->queue, which is NULL in case of dm-raid stacked
on top of MD.
This patch is here for completeness; it has been send to Neil Brown
and linux-raid, Neil said he applied it on Feb 23rd but it did not
show up in upstream as yet.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/raid0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index 3ed9f42..e074813 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -271,14 +271,16 @@ static int create_strip_zones(struct mddev *mddev, struct r0conf **private_conf)
goto abort;
}
- blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
- blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
- (mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) * mddev->raid_disks);
-
- if (!discard_supported)
- queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, mddev->queue);
- else
- queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, mddev->queue);
+ if (mddev->queue) {
+ blk_queue_io_min(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors << 9);
+ blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
+ (mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) * mddev->raid_disks);
+
+ if (!discard_supported)
+ queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, mddev->queue);
+ else
+ queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, mddev->queue);
+ }
pr_debug("md/raid0:%s: done.\n", mdname(mddev));
*private_conf = conf;
@@ -429,9 +431,12 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev)
}
if (md_check_no_bitmap(mddev))
return -EINVAL;
- blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
- blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
- blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
+
+ if (mddev->queue) {
+ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
+ blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
+ blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
+ }
/* if private is not null, we are here after takeover */
if (mddev->private == NULL) {
@@ -448,16 +453,17 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev)
printk(KERN_INFO "md/raid0:%s: md_size is %llu sectors.\n",
mdname(mddev),
(unsigned long long)mddev->array_sectors);
- /* calculate the max read-ahead size.
- * For read-ahead of large files to be effective, we need to
- * readahead at least twice a whole stripe. i.e. number of devices
- * multiplied by chunk size times 2.
- * If an individual device has an ra_pages greater than the
- * chunk size, then we will not drive that device as hard as it
- * wants. We consider this a configuration error: a larger
- * chunksize should be used in that case.
- */
- {
+
+ if (mddev->queue) {
+ /* calculate the max read-ahead size.
+ * For read-ahead of large files to be effective, we need to
+ * readahead at least twice a whole stripe. i.e. number of devices
+ * multiplied by chunk size times 2.
+ * If an individual device has an ra_pages greater than the
+ * chunk size, then we will not drive that device as hard as it
+ * wants. We consider this a configuration error: a larger
+ * chunksize should be used in that case.
+ */
int stripe = mddev->raid_disks *
(mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) / PAGE_SIZE;
if (mddev->queue->backing_dev_info.ra_pages < 2* stripe)
--
2.1.0
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
