> On Apr 10, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07 2015 at 1:10pm -0400, > Ben Collins <ben.c@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 07 2015 at 11:55P -0400, >>> Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> It looks like you're _always_ using the completion regardless of whether >>>> crypt_convert() will be waiting (e.g. even if error is 0). >>>> >>>> I can see this "working" but it seems less than ideal. Would it be >>>> better to record the need to use the completion in ctx and then >>>> conditionally call complete()? >>> >>> Actually, how about using !completion_done() before calling complete()? >>> If you think this would be OK, any chance you could re-test with this? >> >> I'll be able to test it before Friday (out of town). Thanks > > Hi Ben, > > I'm still waiting for test feedback from you on v2. Fairly certain > you'll have the same results but I'd like to be certain before pushing > this upstream. I'll have a response within a couple hours... —— Ben Collins Cyphre Champion ———————————————— Principal Architect Servergy, Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
