On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 02:03:58PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Without knowing too much of detail, asking kernel to restart because one > > block was corrupt sounds little drastic. > > I agree, it's drastic, but in our use case it's necessary, because we have > critical system data on a verified partition. Depending on which blocks are > corrupted, the system may no longer be functional at this point. As a user, I'd rather have half-functioning device where I can at least try to recover some data than a non-functioning device that continuously reboots. I hope that you at least turn this feature off after a few reboots and give the user a chance to save his data. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
