[PATCH 0/3][RESEND] resending find_multipaths patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm resending my find_multipaths patch, based on the conversation I had
here. If nothing else, I'd at least like a discussion about why these
shouldn't go in.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-July/msg00029.html

Just to clarify. find_multipaths is a configurable option that when set to
'yes' will make multipath only run on devices have more than one path.  This
means that users can mostly leave the blacklist alone, and they will only get
the multipath devices that they want. The only time the blacklist is necessary
is when users actually have multiple paths to a device, but still don't want
multipath set up on it.  It's been around since RHEL6, and it is turned on
in the default multipath.conf file in RHEL7. The internal default is "off".

Hannes, do you still object to these?

Benjamin Marzinski (3):
  add find_multipaths option
  libmultipath: only add uninitialized paths in check_path
  Add find_multipaths to multipath.conf man page

 libmultipath/config.c      |  1 +
 libmultipath/config.h      |  1 +
 libmultipath/configure.c   | 11 +++++++++++
 libmultipath/defaults.h    |  1 +
 libmultipath/dict.c        |  4 ++++
 libmultipath/discovery.c   |  2 ++
 libmultipath/structs.h     |  1 +
 libmultipath/wwids.c       | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 libmultipath/wwids.h       |  1 +
 multipath/main.c           | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 multipath/multipath.conf.5 | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 multipathd/main.c          |  9 +++++++++
 12 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux