On Wed, Jan 28 2015 at 5:45am -0500, Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply. > > now based on your advise, if my participation is confirmed, by march, > I would come up with a concrete proposal or an experimental code > to share results at the conference if needed. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal but.. This seems like such a niche issue I think it isn't ever going to get traction. Having a common pool of hot spares doesn't buy you much if all the different volume managers were to experience a failure -- in that case the sharing actively works against you (if you've only accomodated for say 1 of the 3 different volume managers failing at any one time; but if you have provisioned for worst case of all solutions failing then what was the point of the exercise?). -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
