On Fri, Jan 09 2015 at 4:11pm -0500, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Actually, try this one instead, it should be a bit more precise than > the first. > Thanks for the test patch. I'm still seeing failures that look wrong (last_tag=127 could be edge condition not handled properly?): [ 14.254632] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=127, index=3 [ 14.255841] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=64, index=2 [ 14.257036] [ 14.257036] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1 [ 14.258051] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5 [ 14.259246] nr_free=128, nr_reserved=0 [ 14.259963] active_queues=0 [ 213.115997] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=127, index=3 [ 213.117115] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=96, index=3 [ 213.118200] [ 213.118200] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1 [ 213.121593] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5 [ 213.123960] nr_free=128, nr_reserved=0 [ 213.125880] active_queues=0 [ 239.158079] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=8, index=0 [ 239.160363] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=0, index=0 [ 239.162896] [ 239.162896] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1 [ 239.166284] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5 [ 239.168623] nr_free=127, nr_reserved=0 [ 239.170508] active_queues=0 -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
