On Wed, Oct 29 2014 at 3:06pm -0400, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28 2014 at 9:22pm -0400, > Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I pushed rebased versions of these patches to linux-dm.git's > > 'dm-for-3.19' branch (and pulled into 'for-next' purely to get the > > kernel.org autobuilders testing the code). See top 3 commits here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-for-3.19 > > > > I'm open to any and all changes or dropping code entirely; so me staging > > like this is just to keep the review ball rolling as quickly as > > possible. > > > > But in particular we need to get Mikulas' and Bryn's feedback on how the > > dm_internal_{suspend,resume} changes impact dm-stats. > > Rebased, and added a few more changes, see top 5 commits here: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-for-3.19 FYI, Joe was kind enough to write a series of tests for these changes, see: https://github.com/jthornber/device-mapper-test-suite/commit/860555a3e838e995f8f2549deb9fd7ccebb0deb5 https://github.com/jthornber/device-mapper-test-suite/commit/24da8a852bce9ef94db98bdefdf5cd8cd0d5e2eb # dmtest run --profile fusionio --suite thin-provisioning -t /SuspendTests/ Loaded suite thin-provisioning Started SuspendTests suspend_pool_active_thins_no_io...PASS suspend_pool_after_suspend_thin...PASS suspend_pool_concurrent_suspend...PASS suspend_pool_no_active_thins...PASS suspend_pool_no_thins...PASS suspend_pool_resume_thin...PASS suspend_pool_suspended_thin...PASS Finished in 22.350814169 seconds. 7 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
