On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Joe Thornber wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > I created dm-bufio patchset that keep some amount of cache indefinitely, > > > regardless of the timeout (the default is to keep 1/500 of total memory > > > indefinitely). > > I'm running something similar here. I just put in a hard coded > default rather than basing it on the amount of memory present. I'm > not sure which I prefer. > > I've also switched over to using a rbtree instead of that huge hash > table which consumes 8m. > > I'll post clean patches in a bit. > > - Joe Does rbtree have better performance than the hash table? Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
