Dne 6.10.2014 v 10:12 Patrik Horník napsal(a):
OK, I see. So the result is that pool is not activated when it does
not pass check and there is no spare? So is it totally safe to have no
spare?
And so is there a way to reduce size of spare / create spare of
specified (smaller) size after its removal?
Idea behind spare is to have 'reserved' space for pool metadata recovery.
(it's like hidden space in filesystem)
When the pool gets broken and you don't have reserved space for repair
you need to add new free space for recovery.
And at this moment it's getting quite complex (well beyond autonomous
'lvconvert --repair').
So as long as you know what you are doing and you could repair
metadata manually - you are fine.
(You could disable creation of spare volume in lvm.conf)
But lvm2 requires to have reserved space to proceed for --repair.
After all - the size of pool metadata should be pretty small compared with the
rest of VG.
Zdenek
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
