Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > In my "enable gcc format-security check" (9b7741c) commit, I changed > fstack-protector to fstack-protector-strong. This new option only exists > in gcc 4.9, which is relatively new. This patch reverts to the > fstack-protector option for now, until gcc 4.9 has been around for longer. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Makefile.inc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile.inc b/Makefile.inc > index 1486721..20ae23e 100644 > --- a/Makefile.inc > +++ b/Makefile.inc > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ GZIP = gzip -9 -c > INSTALL_PROGRAM = install > > ifndef RPM_OPT_FLAGS > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS = -O2 -g -pipe -Wformat-security -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > + RPM_OPT_FLAGS = -O2 -g -pipe -Wformat-security -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > endif > > OPTFLAGS = $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) -Wunused -Wstrict-prototypes Tested-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@xxxxxx> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
