On Fri, Jul 18 2014 at 7:59am -0400, Vasily Tarasov <tarasov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for your initial reviewing steps! Here is what we plan to do: > > 1) Address your current comments Thanks, try to look at how the other DM targets have tables with arguments that have a fixed position (less flexible than name=value but tools like lvm2 benefit from the rigidity). > 2) Few people mentioned that our documentation need to be formatted > better and be more detailed. We'll address this. Yes, it could be more comprehensive. And it would be nice if it were updated to have the same kind of sections/flow that other targets' Documentation/device-mapper/ files have (e.g. cache.txt and thin-provisioning.txt). But overall the plan sounds great. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
