On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:06:10PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous > > as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used > > fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. > > As any error return is never checked I assumed that 'uninterruptible' > > was correct. > > Bug. It should be uninterruptible in both places. Thanks David, queued the patch! -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
