On 03/03/2014 12:12 AM, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> On 02/28/14 23:33, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> @@ -1214,9 +1189,12 @@ static void pg_init_done(void *data, int errors)
>>
>> if (!m->pg_init_required)
>> m->queue_io = 0;
>> -
>> - m->pg_init_delay_retry = delay_retry;
>> - queue_work(kmultipathd, &m->process_queued_ios);
>> + else if (m->current_pg) {
>> + m->pg_init_delay_retry = delay_retry;
>> + if (__pg_init_all_paths(m))
>> + goto out;
>> + m->queue_io = 0;
>> + }
>
> Hi Hannes,
>
> If m->pg_init_required && !m->current_pg,
> doesn't m->queue_io remain 1 while nobody kicks pg_init?
>
> That's why I suggested this:
>
> if (m->pg_init_required) {
> m->pg_init_delay_retry = delay_retry;
> if (__pg_init_all_paths(m))
> goto out;
> }
> m->queue_io = 0;
>
Yeah, sorry. You are right.
Mike, can you fix it up or do you need an additional round of patches?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
