On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > To use this compression target above dm-thin (likely to prefer larger > block sizes), for example, could the block sizes be adapatable / > configurable? So a key feature of the underlying thin provisioning needs to be efficient tracking of a small sector size (which doesn't suit the existing dm-thin target). This compression target could sometimes benefit from a larger block size though, particularly where the data above has large blocks. (Could we name this something like 'microcompression'?) Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
