On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:21:03PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > + cc->key_extra_size = cc->key_size / cc->key_parts; I don't understand the logic that leads to this assignment. Are there some implicit constraints on the input? Do all invalid inputs produce an appropriate error? Is there a clearer way to set out the calculation and can it be annotated? Can we rename key_extra_size to extrakey_size (like subkey_size)? Is extrakey_size always less than subkey_size? Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel