On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:25:56PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > As for delay being useful for non-test use-cases, that may be but > classifying it as a target that is used for testing is fair (hence > "Useful for testing." in the DM_DELAY help text). That said, if you'd > really prefer DM_DELAY not be nested under DM_TEST_TARGETS I can revert > it. I'm not objecting to its inclusion with the TEST TARGETS, as that remains the primary use of it, but with the statement that the target is then meant only for testing. Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
