On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:54:50PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > I tried the approach with double scan of the message and no reallocation, > but it performs 5% worse on dm-switch table loading. So I stayed with the > current approach that does single scan and argv reallocation. Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
