Re: SCSI's heuristics for enabling WRITE SAME still need work [was: dm mpath: disable WRITE SAME if it fails]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/26/2013 07:39 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-09-25 08:44 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Bernd" == Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Hey Bernd,

Bernd> I'm afraid we have another problem. I'm currently working on to
Bernd> get discard working for our LSI2008 HBAs with attached sata-SSDs
Bernd> and the heuristics in sd_read_write_same with based on VPD page
Bernd> 0x89 is not correct for this HBA - its SATL supports write-same

This has nothing to do with the WRITE SAME heuristics.

It's true that depending on wind and whether we might issue WRITE
SAME(10) or (16) with the UNMAP bit set to perform discard operations on
the low level device. But we use a set of different (and somewhat more
reliable) heuristics to decide which command to send down for that
purpose.

For discards to a SATA device to work you need a recent phase LSI
firmware. And you need the target mode firmware (IT). There is no
UNMAP->DSM TRIM translation in the RAID (IR) firmware.

If your SATA SSDs reports DSM TRIM support, the LSI firmware will set
LBPME=1 in READ CAPACITY(16) and the LOGICAL BLOCK PROVISIONING VPD page
will indicate a preference for the UNMAP command (LBPU=1).

Also, LSI firmware is well-behaved in general and will report ILLEGAL
REQUEST when you send down a command that can't be handled.

An example with a LSI 9212-4i4e running the latest firmware
(P17) connected to a SATA SSD (via an expander):

# sg_vpd /dev/sg1 -p sinq
standard INQUIRY:
   PQual=0  Device_type=0  RMB=0  version=0x06  [SPC-4]
   [AERC=0]  [TrmTsk=0]  NormACA=0  HiSUP=1  Resp_data_format=2
   SCCS=0  ACC=0  TPGS=0  3PC=0  Protect=0  [BQue=0]
   EncServ=0  MultiP=0  [MChngr=0]  [ACKREQQ=0]  Addr16=0
   [RelAdr=0]  WBus16=0  Sync=0  Linked=0  [TranDis=0]  CmdQue=1
   Vendor_identification: ATA
   Product_identification: INTEL SSDSA2M080
   Product_revision_level: 02M3

# sg_vpd /dev/sg1 -p bl
Block limits VPD page (SBC):
   Write same no zero (WSNZ): 0
   Maximum compare and write length: 0 blocks
   Optimal transfer length granularity: 0 blocks
   Maximum transfer length: 0 blocks
   Optimal transfer length: 0 blocks
   Maximum prefetch length: 0 blocks
   Maximum unmap LBA count: 4194303
   Maximum unmap block descriptor count: 32
   Optimal unmap granularity: 1
   Unmap granularity alignment valid: 0
   Unmap granularity alignment: 0
   Maximum write same length: 0x0 blocks

# sg_vpd /dev/sg1 -p lbpv
Logical block provisioning VPD page (SBC):
   Unmap command supported (LBPU): 1
   Write same (16) with unmap bit supported (LBWS): 1
   Write same (10) with unmap bit supported (LBWS10): 0
   Logical block provisioning read zeros (LBPRZ): 0
   Anchored LBAs supported (ANC_SUP): 1
   Threshold exponent: 0
   Descriptor present (DP): 0
   Provisioning type: 0

# sg_opcodes -n /dev/sg1
Report supported operation codes: operation not supported


Room for improvement there. It also supports a useful set
of mode pages (including some chageable fields) and two
log pages.


Both types of systems we have in-house neither block limits vpd nor READ_CAP16 return anything that would indicate discard is supported. But UNMAP and WRITE SAME unmap(*) just work fine.

I certainly don't want to cause any more write-same trouble, but as all layers initially have to assume write same is supported anyway and need to dynamically disable it if it fails, can't we also enable discard by default with WRITE SAME16 unmap?
I'm going to send a PoC patch later on.

The older system I can play with for a few days has an Intel510 (SSDSC2MH25) connected to an LSI SAS9211-8i via a sas enclosure. Ignoring identificication string and revision level, sg_vdp output is almost the same here, but with the exception of

(wheezy)node02:~# sg_vpd /dev/sdb -p bl
Block limits VPD page (SBC):
[...]
  Maximum unmap LBA count: 0
  Maximum unmap block descriptor count: 0
  Optimal unmap granularity: 0
[...]


I think interesting for discard is also read cap 16:

(wheezy)node02:~# sg_readcap --16 /dev/sda
Read Capacity results:
   Protection: prot_en=0, p_type=0, p_i_exponent=0
   Logical block provisioning: lbpme=0, lbprz=0
   Last logical block address=490350671 (0x1d3a284f), Number of logical blocks=490350672
   Logical block length=512 bytes
   Logical blocks per physical block exponent=0
   Lowest aligned logical block address=0
Hence:
   Device size: 251059544064 bytes, 239429.0 MiB, 251.06 GB


So again no indication of discard support.


We also long ago flushed the IT fw and just recently updated to fw version 17
mpt2sas0: LSISAS2008: FWVersion(17.00.01.00), ChipRevision(0x03), BiosVersion(07.33.00.00)
mpt2sas0: Protocol=(Initiator,Target), Capabilities=(TLR,EEDP,Snapshot Buffer,Diag Trace Buffer,Task Set Full,NCQ)


Thanks,
Bernd


PS: LSI SATL with FWv17 seems to have an unmap bug - I cannot unmap the last sector:

(wheezy)node02:~# cat /sys/block/sdb/size
488397168

(wheezy)node02:~# sg_write_same --16 --unmap --verbose --lba=488397167 --num=1 /dev/sdb
Default data-out buffer set to 512 zeros

So write same works. But then unmap fails:

(wheezy)node02:~# sg_unmap --verbose --lba=488397167 --num=1 /dev/sdb
    unmap cdb: 42 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 00
unmap:  Fixed format, current;  Sense key: Illegal Request
 Additional sense: Logical block address out of range
  Info fld=0x1d1c596f [488397167]
bad field in UNMAP cdb

All sectors before that work fine:

(wheezy)node02:~# sg_unmap --verbose --lba=0 --num=488397167 /dev/sdb
    unmap cdb: 42 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 00
(







--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux