On Thu, Sep 12 2013 at 6:47pm -0400, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We don't need this. bio-based i/o should be fine with a small mempool, > there is no need to make it tunable. I'd like to get Frank's insight here. He clearly had an interest in tuning bio-based also. While 16 shouldn't really hurt it could still be artifically high. I'm not opposed to exposing a sane default but allowing other to experiemnt (in production workloads) with smaller values that still enable forward progress should memory get exhausted. Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
