On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote: > Mikulas' point is that you cannot reduce the size to smaller than 1. > And aside from rq-based DM, 1 is sufficient to allow for forward > progress even when memory is completely consumed. > > A patch that simply changes them to 1 but makes the rq-based DM > mempool's size configurable should actually be fine. Yes, I think it would be viable. Mikulas > Mike -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
