On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25 2013 at 9:48am -0400, > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > > I spoke with Hannes at LSF, to address the potential crashes in the > > > endio path (e.g. stpg_endio) we'd have to bump the scsi_dh_data kref > > > where appropriate (e.g. for ALUA kref_get in submit_stpg and kref_put in > > > stpg_endio). > > > > > > But that is just the tip of the iceberg relative to scsi_dh lifetime. > > > Seems we've been playing it pretty fast and loose with scsi_dh issued > > > requests vs detach for quite some time. > > > > > > I'm now inclined to not care about this issue. Take away is: don't > > > switch the device handler (attach the correct one from the start). > > > > I did a patch that disables device handler switching and it was NACKed by > > Hannes. The problem that he pointed out was - when we load SCSI device > > handler modules, they attach automatically to SCSI devices they think they > > belong to. The user then can't set the desired device handler in multipath > > configuration because a different handler is already attached. > > The handler that is automatically attached _should_ be the correct > handler. We now have the .match() hook for scsi_dh and it has made for > reliable scsi_dh attachment of the correct handler. The EMC devices work with both ALUA and EMC handlers - so there is no one "correct" handler, the correct handler is the one that the user specified in multipath configuration. > > So we need a functionality to change device handlers. > > I really cannot think of a sequence where the scsi_dh .match() will > attach the incorrect handler. This is why I added the > "retain_attached_hw_handler" feature to mpath (commit a58a935d5). The automatic handler assigment can't change existing handler. But if one handler was automatically selected and the user selects a different handler in multipath configuration, the handler is changed. > > (or maybe stop the scsi device handlers from attaching automatically, but > > it would surely generate a lot of other regressions) > > The need to support changing device handlers (via multipath table load) > is overblown/historic. So - do you mean that we make "retain_attached_hw_handler" the default option and don't allow the user to change existing device handler in multipath configuration? That's what my patch did and it was NACKed by Hannes. The problem there is that behavior depends on module loading order - if you activate multipath with "EMC" option, it activates the EMC handler. If you load the ALUA module and activate multipath with "EMC" option, it stays with the ALUA handler. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
