Re: [PATCH 09/27] block: Use bio_sectors() more consistently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That looks OK to me.

(I notice that while back in October it included changes to aoe, the current patch does not, which is fine.)

On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:

> Bunch of places in the code weren't using it where they could be -
> this'll reduce the size of the patch that puts bi_sector/bi_size/bi_idx
> into a struct bvec_iter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Jim Paris <jim@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Geoff Levand <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Alasdair Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/pktcdvd.c      |  2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-raid1.c        |  2 +-
> drivers/md/raid0.c           |  6 +++---
> drivers/md/raid1.c           | 17 ++++++++---------
> drivers/md/raid10.c          | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> drivers/md/raid5.c           |  8 ++++----
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c           |  2 +-
> include/trace/events/block.h | 12 ++++++------
> 8 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
...

-- 
  Ed Cashin
  ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx



--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux