On Mon, Jan 21 2013 at 12:26am -0500, Amit Kale <akale@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Snitzer [mailto:snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 3:08 AM > > To: Darrick J. Wong > > Cc: device-mapper development; Amit Kale; linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx; LKML; lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joe > > Thornber > > Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Re: Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO > > SSD caching software for Linux kernel > > > > On Fri, Jan 18 2013 at 4:25pm -0500, > > Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Since Joe is putting together a testing tree to compare the three > > > caching things, what do you all think of having a(nother) session > > > about ssd caching at this year's LSFMM Summit? > > > > > > [Apologies for hijacking the thread.] > > > [Adding lsf-pc to the cc list.] > > > > Hopefully we'll have some findings on the comparisons well before LSF > > (since we currently have some momentum). But yes it may be worthwhile > > to discuss things further and/or report findings. > > We should have performance comparisons presented well before the > summit. It'll be good to have ssd caching session in any case. The > likelihood that one of them will be included in Linux kernel before > April is very low. dm-cache is under active review for upstream inclusion. I wouldn't categorize the chances of dm-cache going upstream when the v3.9 merge window opens as "very low". But even if dm-cache does go upstream it doesn't preclude bcache and/or enhanceio from going upstream too. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
