Tejun Heo wrote: >> +#define hash_min(val, bits) \ >> +({ \ >> + sizeof(val) <= 4 ? \ >> + hash_32(val, bits) : \ >> + hash_long(val, bits); \ >> +}) > Also, you probably want () around at least @val. In general, > it's a good idea to add () around any macro argument to avoid nasty > surprises. Er... not in this case, you don't. If a macro argument is passed verbatim as an argument to a function, it doesn't need additional parens. That's because the one guarantee you have about a macro argument is that it can't contain any (unquoted) commas, and there's nothing lower precedence than the comma. So it's safe to delimit a macro argument with *either* parens *or* a comma. So you can go ahead and write: #define hash_min(val, bits) \ (sizeof(val) <= 4 ? hash_32(val, bits) : hash_long(val, bits)) ... which is easier to read, anyway. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel