Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Fix a buffer overrun in bio_integrity_split()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Tejun" == Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Tejun> If Martin is happy with it, I'm not gonna push it but putting the
Tejun> respective storage member after one containing vararray at the
Tejun> end is a legit way to allocate the area statically. As long as
Tejun> the storage field is marked as such and not accessed directly, it
Tejun> doesn't matter whether there's padding inbetween or not. 

The embedded array is still at the end. Kent just added an explicit
pointer for use in the bio_pair corner case.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux