On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 02:20:51PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > > I sympathize, but the reality is that the current infrastructure > is very bad and no one is using it. > > It's not like we're getting rid of the syscall. I'll be behaving > exactly as it does today: returning the error code that indicates that > cancellation failed because it lost the race with completion. Every > caller has to cope with that to use cancel safely. Yes, I realize it doesn't work today. But hopefully we'll be able to reimplement it in a cleaner way. That's why I said, I hope we don't give up on the functionality of aio_cancel --- not that I'm against removing what we currently have. Cheers, - Ted -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
