>>>>> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > + *bp->bip1.bip_vec = bip->bip_vec[0]; >> > + *bp->bip2.bip_vec = bip->bip_vec[0]; >> >> I think this is horrible. Yep. >> Why not introduce bvec pointer in bip (like bio), to cover the case >> when bvec are not inline. Kent> That's... exactly what the next patch in the series does. I'm perfectly ok with a patch that introduces the pointer and fixes the bio_pair case. As long as that's all it does. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
