On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:11:05PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:32PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:51PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > Random cleanup - this code was duplicated and it's not really specific > > > to md. > > > > > > Also added the ability to return the actual error code. > > > > Who is going to make use of actual error code and why checking > > BIO_UPTODATE is not sufficient (as existing code is doing)? > > Some things do, though it's not common and I forget where I saw it - > checking for -ENOTSUPPORTED vs. other stuff May be we can introduce "submit_bio_ret" stuff when we find the actual user in the series. Justifying code change becomes easier. Thanks Vivek -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
