On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:11:17PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Don't think any shutdown should be initiated by the kernel. > > But events that userspace could respond to by deactivating (an > arbitrarily complex) lvm device would be the way forward IMHO. Deactivating is maybe a bit of a too strong word. But I'd expect we'll get EIO from al sectors not just those on the failed device. > Could this tie back to needing better UA handling/notification between > kernel<->userspace? That current proposed solution we have internally is to simply poll the status output for the PVs and handle it all in userspace. To me this seems a bit clumsy, but at least it's easily doable in short time. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
