On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:22:30PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > A bunch of what __blk_queue_bounce() was doing was problematic for the > immutable bvec work; this cleans that up and the code is quite a bit > smaller, too. > > The __bio_for_each_segment() in copy_to_high_bio_irq() was changed > because that one's looping over the original bio, not the bounce bio - > since the bounce code doesn't own that bio the __ version wasn't > correct. Also, I can't understand the above at all. I can think why it wouldn't be necessary but why is it wrong because bounce code doesn't own it? -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
