On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:09:45PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:06:32PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:22:26PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > +void bio_copy_data(struct bio *dst, struct bio *src) > > > +{ > > ... > > > + src_p = kmap_atomic(src_bv->bv_page); > > > + dst_p = kmap_atomic(dst_bv->bv_page); > > > + > > > + memcpy(dst_p + dst_bv->bv_offset, > > > + src_p + src_bv->bv_offset, > > > + bytes); > > > + > > > + kunmap_atomic(dst_p); > > > + kunmap_atomic(src_p); > > > > Wrap these in preempt_disable/enable() to allow the function to be > > called from any context? > > I checked the implementation of kmap_atomic(), it already does > preempt_disable() so it's safe in process context - if I understand > correctly it needs local_irq_save()/restore() to be safe in any context > and I figured calling this from irq context is not the norm so that > should be the caller's responsibility. Ooh, that means the patch I just sent Andrew about sg_mapping_iter is still too strict. Thanks. -- tejun -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel