On 09/04/2012 11:41 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Ah, I missed the condition with the rec == &pg->records[pg->index]. But > if ftrace_pages_start is NULL, the rec = &pg->records[pg->index] will > fault. Right. > > You could do something like rec = pg ? &pg->records[pg->index] : NULL, Right. > but IIRC, the comma operator does not guarantee order evaluation. That > is, the compiler is allowed to process "a , b" as "b; a;" and not "a; > b;". Not true. The comma operator introduces a sequence point. It's the comma that separates function parameters that doesn't guarantee ordering. -- Pedro Alves -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
