On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:01:19PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Actually, if the timer approach can reduce the frequency of rescuer > > involvement, I think it could actually be better. > > Ooh, it wouldn't. It's kicking in only after alloc failure. I don't > know. I think conditioning it on alloc failure is cleaner and > converting all per-bio allocations to front-pad makes sense. Using a > timer wouldn't make the mechanism any simpler, right? Exactly -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
