Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] block: Kill bi_destructor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But if it's a pointer to heap allocated memory, but the bio was embedded
> in another struct? I've seen a fair number of instances of that (md, off
> the top of my head).
>
> If you're sure that in a normal config the slab allocator is going to
> complain right away and not corrupt itself, fine. But I've been bitten
> way too hard by bugs that could've been caught right away by a simple
> assert and instead I had to spend hours backtracking, and the block
> layer is _rife_ with that kind of thing.

Let's let slab debug code deal with that.  I really don't see much
benefit in doing this.  The said kind of bugs aren't particularly
difficult to track down.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux