On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In particular, if this change breaks anything then the new bio_split() > _will_ break things. > > We need to be clear about our interfaces; in this case bi_idx and > bi_vcnt, in particular. Either this is a safe change, or it's not. If > no one knows... that's a bigger problem, and not just for this patch... > > Fortunately this code actually has been tested quite a bit (and the bio > splitting code for even longer), and (somewhat to my surprise) I haven't > run into any bugs caused by it. Oh, it's worse than that - remember how bio_kmalloc() works for up to 1024 pages, but bio_alloc_bioset() only up to 256? We can already have situations where bios are allocated that are impossible to clone (or if we don't, it's only because of queue_limits. That's not sketchy at all.) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
