Version 2 in response to minor conflicts found with existing patches in linux-next
brassow
dm-raid: For code clarity, change 'if' conditional to 'switch' conditional
In preparation for RAID10 addition to dm-raid, we change an 'if' conditional
to a 'switch' conditional to make it easier to see what is being checked for
each RAID type.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
===================================================================
--- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -423,13 +423,26 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid
if (!strcasecmp(key, "rebuild")) {
rebuild_cnt++;
- if (((rs->raid_type->level != 1) &&
- (rebuild_cnt > rs->raid_type->parity_devs)) ||
- ((rs->raid_type->level == 1) &&
- (rebuild_cnt > (rs->md.raid_disks - 1)))) {
- rs->ti->error = "Too many rebuild devices specified for given RAID type";
- return -EINVAL;
+ rs->ti->error = NULL;
+
+ switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
+ case 1:
+ if (rebuild_cnt >= rs->md.raid_disks)
+ rs->ti->error = "Too many rebuild devices specified";
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ case 5:
+ case 6:
+ if (rebuild_cnt > rs->raid_type->parity_devs)
+ rs->ti->error = "Too many rebuild devices specified for given RAID type";
+ break;
+ default:
+ DMERR("The rebuild parameter is not supported for %s", rs->raid_type->name);
+ rs->ti->error = "Rebuild not supported for this RAID type";
}
+ if (rs->ti->error)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (value > rs->md.raid_disks) {
rs->ti->error = "Invalid rebuild index given";
return -EINVAL;
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
