Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 26 2012 at  2:32pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Introduce scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() to retrieve the name of the
> scsi_dh that is attached to the scsi_device associated with the provided
> request queue.  Returns NULL if a scsi_dh is not attached.
> 
> Also, fix scsi_dh_{attach,detach} function header comments to document
> @q rather than @sdev.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Hi James,

Any insight on staging this scsi_dh patch for 3.6?

Or what about adding your Acked-by and allowing Alasdair to submit it
for 3.6 with the corresponding dm-mpath patch?

However you'd like to skin it is fine by me.  I'd just _really_
appreciate some feedback.

Thanks,
Mike

p.s. I'm nothing if not persistent ;)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux