Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > It is concerning that a FLUSH may fail but the blkdev_issue_flush > callers assume it will always succeed. > > Each blkdev_issue_flush caller should come to terms with the reality > that a FLUSH may fail -- the file_operations' .fsync methods in > particular. nilfs2 is the only filesystem that checks > blkdev_issue_flush's return. Yeah, as it stands, it looks like in many cases fsync won't return an error if a flush fails. That's bad. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
