On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>
> [..]
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index 013c7a5..5a953c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
>> }
>>
>> while (old_chain && (total < len)) {
>> - tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs);
>> + tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask);
>> if (!tmp)
>> goto err_out;
>>
>> @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
>> if (!bp)
>> goto err_out;
>>
>> - __bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1);
>> -
>> *next = &bp->bio2;
>
> Is this code correct. Now original code might clone bio after split and
> new code will clone the original bio itself and not the split one?
>
Yeah, that's wrong.
Yehuda
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
