Hi, On 05/22/12 00:42, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 05/17/2012 11:09 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote: >> However, when it is target/host that is busy, I think dm should >> send the request down and let SCSI, which has better knowledge >> about the shared resource, do appropriate starvation control. >> >> Could you try the attached patch? ... > Thanks, that works fine! I had something else in my mind for multipath, but if this can go into scsi we don't need the multipath patch anymore. > Are you going to officially submit it (missing signed-off)? Thank you for testing. Yes, I'll submit it officially with your Reported-by/Tested-by. Also, a note suggested by Mike Snitzer will be added to the patch description. (Thanks Mike.) -- Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
