On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you want me to implement bcache differently, shouldn't you explain why relax. I explained it already but you are defensive about your code. flash-cache works, period. And I may be wrong but it is GPL'd. If perf is an issue then atleast let everyone know how it can be improved rather than saying my way or the highway. aren't you saying in your patches - support for thin prov etc. but if dm provides it then why are you duplicating code? > why? I'm not sure why I _have_ to justify my decisions to you. Others might want to contribute to it and not just consume it. This ain't your local sandbox. So it's quite common to get such questions when you are trying to add new functionality. May be I missed some of your emails. If so point me to them. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
