Re: Benchmarking dm-crypt with different block size, request number and scheduler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:

> Were these tests all using that 'worst case' alignment you mentioned?
> - If so, people with such alignment could be advised to use deadline with
>   huge queue depth?
> 
> Alasdair

Some tests are with 512-byte block size, other with 4096-byte block size.

Alignment of partition start doesn't matter, because they were done on a 
SCSI disk with 512-byte hardware sector size. Only alignment of partition 
size does matter (if the partition has odd number of sectors, the kernel 
uses 512-byte block size for this partition).

Mikulas

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux